Economic Sanctions – Are They Still Effective?

Economic sanctions are a key tool used by many countries to influence the behavior of other nations without resorting to military action. While they can create significant economic pressure in the short to medium term, their effectiveness is often debated over longer periods of time. In this article, we’ll delve into the impacts of sanctions, analyze case studies of Iran, North Korea, and Russia, and explore the overall effectiveness and alternatives to these measures, particularly from the perspective of the United States.

What are Economic Sanctions?

Definition and Types of Sanctions

Economic sanctions are restrictive measures imposed by one country (or group of countries) to influence the behavior of another. They can take various forms, including:

  • Trade Restrictions: Limiting exports and imports to and from the targeted country.
  • Asset Freezes: Blocking access to financial assets held abroad.
  • Travel Bans: Preventing individuals from traveling to or through the sanctioning country.
  • Financial Sanctions: Restricting access to international financial systems, such as banks and payment networks.

Purpose and Goals

The primary goals of economic sanctions are to:

  • Deter undesirable actions (e.g., aggression, human rights abuses).
  • Weaken the target country’s ability to carry out such actions.
  • Force a change in policy or behavior without direct military intervention.

Sanctions are often part of a broader strategy, combined with diplomatic efforts and other measures to achieve desired outcomes geopolitically. The United States has been leaning on its economic sanction cudgel increasingly so over the last decade per CFR, and it has greatly accelerated since Russia invaded Ukraine earlier in the decade, with the goal of slowing down the Russian war machine.

Bar chart titled "U.S. Sanctions Use Has Escalated Over the Past Decade," showing new sanctions designations per year from 2010 to 2022, with a significant increase in 2022 noted as corresponding with Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Data sourced from the Center for a New American Security and presented by the Council on Foreign Relations.
Bar chart titled “U.S. Sanctions Use Has Escalated Over the Past Decade,” showing new sanctions designations per year from 2010 to 2022.

How Sanctions Affect Economies

Impact on Targeted Countries

Economic sanctions can severely impact the targeted nation’s economy depending upon their ability to find alternative trade partners, and the composition of their economy:

  • Economic Isolation: By restricting trade and financial transactions, sanctions can isolate a country from global markets, reducing its economic growth.
  • Trade Disruptions: Sanctions can lead to significant trade disruptions, causing shortages of essential goods, increased prices, and economic instability.
  • Currency Devaluation: Restrictions on financial transactions can lead to a sharp devaluation of the local currency, exacerbating economic woes and making imports more expensive.

Consequences for Global Markets

Sanctions can also affect the global economy:

  • Supply Chain Interruptions: Disruptions in trade can lead to shortages of key commodities and goods, affecting global supply chains.
  • Inflation: Increased prices due to shortages can contribute to inflationary pressures in both the targeted and sanctioning countries.
  • Shifts in Global Trade Dynamics: Sanctions can force countries to seek new trade partners, leading to shifts in global trade relationships and alliances.

Case Studies

Iran

Historical Background

Iran has faced various sanctions from the United States and other countries since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, with intensified measures in response to its nuclear program. These sanctions have targeted Iran’s oil exports, financial transactions, and access to international markets.

Timeline chart titled "U.S. Sanctions Programs," showing the duration and initiation of various U.S. sanctions from 1960 to 2022, including sanctions on Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, and Russia, as well as nonproliferation, counternarcotics, and counterterrorism sanctions, sourced from the U.S. Department of the Treasury and presented by the Council on Foreign Relations.
Timeline chart titled “U.S. Sanctions Programs,” showing the duration and initiation of various U.S. sanctions from 1960 to 2022.

Economic Impacts

Sanctions have significantly impacted Iran’s economy:

  • Oil Revenue Decline: As a major oil exporter, restrictions have drastically cut Iran’s oil revenue. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, Iran’s oil exports dropped from 2.5 million barrels per day in 2011 to less than 300,000 barrels per day in 2019.
  • Inflation and Unemployment: The economy has faced high inflation rates, reaching 30.5% in 2018, and rising unemployment, which hit 14.5% in 2019.
  • Currency Devaluation: The Iranian rial has depreciated sharply against major currencies, losing about 60% of its value in 2018 alone.

North Korea

Overview of Sanctions History

North Korea has been subject to international sanctions due to its nuclear weapons program and human rights abuses (and their crazy leader). The sanctions have aimed to cut off resources needed for its nuclear ambitions.

Economic and Humanitarian Consequences

The sanctions have led to:

  • Resource Scarcity: Severe shortages of food, fuel, and other essential goods have been reported, leading to a humanitarian crisis.
  • Economic Stagnation: North Korea’s economy has faced limited growth due to restricted access to international markets and resources.
  • Humanitarian Crisis: Widespread poverty and malnutrition among the North Korean population have been exacerbated by the sanctions.

According to a BBC News report, these sanctions have isolated North Korea economically but have not yet led to significant policy changes.

Russia During the Ukraine Conflict

Overview of Sanctions Imposed

Following Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its current involvement in the Ukraine conflict, Western countries, lead by the United States, imposed extensive sanctions targeting key sectors such as finance, energy, and defense. The sanctions were further intensified after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Economic Effects

Sanctions have significantly impacted Russia’s economy, but the extent and effectiveness are complex and ultimately depend on what the sanction goals are:

  • Financial Sector Impact: One of the most significant moves was the freezing of $5 billion in Russian central bank assets in the United States, an unprecedented step aimed at crippling Russia’s ability to use its foreign reserves to stabilize the ruble. This was accompanied by restrictions on Russian banks from accessing the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), a crucial service for international financial transactions​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​.
  • Recession: Russia’s economy faced a recession in 2015, with GDP contracting by 2.3%. The impact of the 2022 sanctions was more severe, leading to another significant economic downturn. According to the World Bank, Russia’s GDP was projected to contract by up to 11% in 2022, the largest economic decline since the early 1990s​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​.
  • Currency Devaluation: The ruble experienced severe devaluation, particularly in the immediate aftermath of the 2022 sanctions. The ruble lost nearly half its value against the dollar in 2014 during the Crimea crisis and faced another steep decline in 2022​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​. The rapid depreciation led to inflation, increasing the cost of imported goods and placing further strain on the Russian economy.
  • Energy Sector: Sanctions targeted Russia’s crucial energy sector, which accounts for a significant portion of its export revenues. The United States and its allies banned the import of Russian oil and gas, which was a major blow considering that energy exports comprised nearly half of Russia’s total export revenue in 2021. The G7 nations also implemented a price cap on Russian oil, aiming to reduce Moscow’s income while maintaining stable global energy prices​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​.
  • Isolation from Western Markets: Sanctions have made it difficult for Russian companies to access international finance and technology, leading to long-term implications for industries ranging from automotive to aerospace. Western companies have pulled out of Russia, leading to job losses and further economic isolation. For example, major firms like BP, Shell, and ExxonMobil announced their exit from Russian projects, which also impacts the technological and operational capacity of the Russian energy sector​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​.
  • Military Technology: The sanctions have restricted Russia’s access to high-tech products, including semiconductors and aircraft parts, which are crucial for both civilian and military applications. This has directly impacted Russia’s military capabilities, making it harder for them to replenish equipment lost in the conflict and to develop new technologies​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​.

Socioeconomic Consequences

The broader socioeconomic impacts of sanctions on Russia have been profound:

  • Inflation and Living Standards: Inflation has surged due to the devaluation of the ruble and the increased cost of imports. The Russian government has attempted to mitigate these effects through price controls and subsidies, but these measures have only provided partial relief. Rising prices for basic goods and services have significantly affected the living standards of ordinary Russians​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​.
  • Government Response: The Russian government has taken several steps to stabilize the economy, including increasing interest rates, imposing capital controls, and using its National Wealth Fund to support key industries. Despite these efforts, the overall economic outlook remains challenging​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​.
  • Social Unrest: While there has not been widespread social unrest, the prolonged economic difficulties could potentially lead to increased dissatisfaction among the populace. The Kremlin has tightened control over the media and public discourse to maintain stability, but the long-term effects of economic hardship could pose a significant challenge​ (Council on Foreign Relations)​.

Circumventing Sanctions: The Role of Cryptocurrency and Alternative Trade Relationships

Increasing Ease of Circumvention

Sanctions have become easier to circumvent as countries develop new methods to bypass restrictions. Russia, China, and other nations have increasingly cooperated to trade outside of US sanctions, using alternative methods like cryptocurrency, barter systems and the BRICS coalition. Russian sanctions have also proved less effective in terms of crippling the Russian economy because of how critical Russian energy exports are to the rest of the world – some countries just can’t operate without them, so Russia has them over a barrel.

Cryptocurrency: A New Frontier

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum provide a decentralized means of conducting transactions, making it difficult for sanctioning bodies to track and control financial flows. For example, Russia has explored using digital currencies to trade oil and gas, bypassing traditional banking systems that are subject to sanctions. North Korea is well known to utilize cryptocurrencies to circumvent sanctions, using privacy-minded cryptocurrencies and other identity obfuscation methods on the blockchain to hide from prying Western eyes.

Alternative Trade Relationships

Countries under sanctions have also turned to alternative trade relationships. China and Russia, for instance, have strengthened their economic ties, conducting trade in their local currencies instead of the US dollar. This move reduces their dependence on Western financial systems and allows to bypass sanctions more effectively, especially moving forward since projections suggest China will be the largest economy in the world by 2040. It stands to reason that they could very easily say adopt our financial system or you’re cut off once they reach that kind of economic power.

More dangerously, it allows them to work together with regards to military technology. Given that the US sanctions cut Russia off from high-end tech needed for military modernization and upgrades, a cozy relationship with China means that Russia can have access to these materials, severely undercutting the Western effort to dismantle the Russian war machine.

The Impact on Sanction Effectiveness

The increasing ability to circumvent sanctions poses a significant challenge to their effectiveness. As targeted countries find new ways to sustain their economies and continue their policies, the intended pressure of sanctions diminishes. This trend highlights the need for more adaptive and multifaceted approaches to international diplomacy and economic coercion.

Alternatives to Sanctions

Given the mixed results of economic sanctions depending on a variety of factors, exploring alternatives is essential:

Diplomatic Negotiations

Engaging in direct talks and negotiations can sometimes yield better results than punitive measures. Diplomacy allows for dialogue and compromise, reducing the likelihood of prolonged conflict.

International Cooperation and Treaties

Working through international organizations like the United Nations can help build consensus and implement comprehensive strategies that include sanctions as part of a broader approach.

Economic Incentives and Aid

Offering economic incentives or development aid can encourage positive behavior changes without the adverse effects of sanctions. These measures can build goodwill and foster cooperation.

Cyber Measures and Targeted Actions

Targeted cyber operations and other precise actions can disrupt specific activities (e.g., nuclear programs) without broadly affecting the civilian population.

So are they still effective?

Economic sanctions are a powerful tool in the international community’s arsenal, but their effectiveness is not guaranteed. While they can pressure target countries and signal disapproval, sanctions also have significant economic and humanitarian consequences. The mixed results seen in Iran, North Korea, and Russia highlight the need for a nuanced approach, combining sanctions with diplomacy, international cooperation, and targeted measures.

The “success” of sanctions depends upon the goals with which they were implemented. Is the purpose to cripple an economy? Slow down a nuclear program? Make life just generally harder? As sanctions fail, undoubtedly the goalposts move on the original goals, but the original intended purpose is how we gauge their effectiveness. Ultimately, the success of sanctions depends on their implementation, enforcement, and integration into a broader strategy, and the economic composition and geopolitical situation of a nation.

For further reading and a deeper understanding, check out reliable sources such as Council on Foreign Relations, BBC News, and Brookings Institution.

Stay up to date with the latest information and articles around Economics, Geopolitics, Climate Change & more at Preparedness & Policy.

Stay Informed. Stay Ready.

Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.